« Domo! | Main | Head Cop's a Big Fat Liar »

The On-Going Battle of 10K vs Pro-Forma

Per Paul Krugman in the NYTimes: [link requires free registration]

For corporate America as a whole, 1997 was a watershed year. According to government statistics, overall corporate profits grew rapidly between 1992 and 1997, but then stalled; after-tax profits in the third quarter of 2000 were barely higher than they were three years earlier. But the operating earnings of the S.&P. 500 — that is, the profits companies reported to investors — grew 46 percent over those three years.

Basically, public companies are lying to their investors, and there is not a significant amount of pressure in D.C. to change the accouting rules. It's a shame, because people are being manipulated. This is certainly not the first time I've seen the Operating Earnings (annual report or pro-forma earnings announcements) compared to the 10-K earnings (reported to the SEC), and the differences are astounding.

It's not just Enron, far from it. Almost everyone plays the game of rigging the earnings. I can't figure out why it's not getting more attention. Of course, I can't figure out why newspapers run front page stories about how great the economy is and then hide the dismal numbers deep within the business section...


Posted by nicole at May 22, 2002 07:02 AM
Comments
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:



Anti-spambot code:

Comments: