<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Astrogirl &#187; artificial sweeteners</title>
	<atom:link href="http://astrogirl.com/tag/artificial-sweeteners/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://astrogirl.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 21:07:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Zero Calorie Sweeteners</title>
		<link>http://astrogirl.com/2009/11/16/zero-calorie-sweeteners/</link>
		<comments>http://astrogirl.com/2009/11/16/zero-calorie-sweeteners/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 14:33:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nicole</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Food]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web log]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[agave nectar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[artificial sweeteners]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Diet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[glycemic index]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[processed food]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stevia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trans-fatty acids]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[zero calorie sweeteners]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://astrogirl.com/2009/11/16/zero-calorie-sweeteners/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I am suspicious of all zero calorie sweeteners, even stevia.  I think they promote an endless cycle of sugar cravings in a lot of people, but what it really boils down to is this:</p>
<p align="center">

</p>
<p>This is from a margarine commercial well-known to those in my age group.  We can see where telling everyone [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am suspicious of all zero calorie sweeteners, even stevia.  I think they promote an endless cycle of sugar cravings in a lot of people, but what it really boils down to is this:</p>
<p align="center">
<object classid="clsid:02BF25D5-8C17-4B23-BC80-D3488ABDDC6B" width="320" height="256" codebase="http://www.apple.com/qtactivex/qtplugin.cab"><param name="src" value="http://astrogirl.com/images/NotNice.m4v" /><param name="autoplay" value="false" /><param name="controller" value="true" /><embed src="http://astrogirl.com/images/NotNice.m4v" width="320" height="256" autoplay="false" controller="true" pluginspage="http://www.apple.com/quicktime/download/"></embed></object>
</p>
<p>This is from a margarine commercial well-known to those in my age group.  We can see where telling everyone to eat margarine got us, so I&#8217;m not going into the trans-fat travesty here.</p>
<p>I think most of us have heard that <a href="http://www.medicinenet.com/script/main/art.asp?articlekey=81475&#038;page=8#aspartamecon" target="_blank">aspartame (Equal, Nutrasweet)</a> is bad stuff.  Some doctors even claim it&#8217;s inappropriate for diabetics because it messes with blood sugar, but mostly, we hear about it being bad for our brains or causing cancer or whatever.  Most of the websites talking about this seem a bit nutty, but there was talk in the summer that the <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/samuel-s-epstein/an-overdue-ban-on-a-dange_b_250249.html?view=print">FDA might ban it</a>.</p>
<p>There are also studies that show <a href="http://www.medicinenet.com/artificial_sweeteners/page9.htm" target="_blank">sucralose (Splenda) might be bad</a> for you, and I&#8217;m sure we all remember the very public <a href="http://www.medicinenet.com/script/main/art.asp?articlekey=81475&amp;page=6#saccharincon" target="_blank">saccharin (SugarTwin, Sweet N Low)</a> scare.</p>
<p><a name="agave_nectar">Agave nectar</a> is NOT a zero calorie sweetener.  Some people seem to have the idea that it&#8217;s magical stuff.  The only actual claim made is that it&#8217;s lower on the glycemic index than other sugars, but it has the same caloric value as honey (about 60 per Tablespoon).  Agave nectar is mostly fructose, which is why it&#8217;s supposedly better for diabetics (and thus it&#8217;s G.I. rating).  My guess is that most people who are so into agave nectar would not buy &#8220;artificial&#8221; diabetic products, many of which are sweetened with refined fructose.  Agave nectar <a href="http://www.naturalnews.com/024892_fructose_food_health.html" target="_blank">IS refined fructose</a>.</p>
<p>Anyway, moving on.</p>
<p>You&#8217;ve probably only heard great things about stevia because, like agave nectar, it&#8217;s billed as &#8220;all natural.&#8221;  I&#8217;m not going to refute that claim since I don&#8217;t have issues with it.  I do have issues with it&#8217;s effects, and I happen to think its taste leaves a lot to be desired.  Taste is hard to refute, but I <a href="http://www.steviainfo.com/?page=articles_detail&#038;id=9" target="_blank">don&#8217;t think this is</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>
An intra-arterial catheter was inserted into the rats after 5 weeks, and conscious rats were subjected to arterial glucose tolerance test (2.0 g kg 1) during week 6. Stevioside had an antihyperglycemic effect (incremental area under the glucose response curve [IAUC]): 985 20 (stevioside) versus 1,575 21 (control) mmol/L 180 minutes, (P less than .05), it enhanced the first-phase insulin response (IAUC: 343 33 [stevioside] v 136 24 [control] U/mL insulin 30 minutes, P < .05) and concomitantly suppressed the glucagon levels (total AUC: 2,026 234 [stevioside] v 3,535 282 [control] pg/mL 180 minutes, P < .05).
</p></blockquote>
<p>It causes a release of insulin.  This is a drug-like effect.  If you&#8217;re not consuming sugar &#8211; let&#8217;s say you&#8217;re sweetening your black coffee with stevia &#8211; do you really want insulin released?  Is that I good idea?  I sure would not want to use this in green tea or coffee if I&#8217;m trying to, say, do an intermittent fast.  It also may lower blood pressure, which may also not be a good thing.</p>
<p>The moral of the story here is that <i>There&#8217;s No Such Thing As A Free Lunch</i>.  You&#8217;ll pay for it one way or another, and the best thing to do is to get used to the actual taste of foods.  If it&#8217;s Christmas, your birthday or Thanksgiving and you&#8217;re not a diabetic who will have serious problems from ingesting sugar, just eat the real thing.  If you really want a soda, just have the real item.  High-fructose corn syrup is more natural than any of the artificial sweeteners, and studies keep popping up that diet soda does NOT help people <a href="http://www.creators.com/health/rallie-mcallister-your-health/drinking-diet-sodas-may-sabotage-weight-loss-efforts.html" target="_blank">lose weight or stay thin anyway</a>.</p>
<blockquote><p>
Along with colleague Ken Williams and principal investigator Michael Stern, M.D., Fowler examined the association between consumption of diet and regular soft drinks and weight gain in 622 non-overweight adults. The researchers measured each participant&#8217;s Body Mass Index (BMI) and individual soft drink consumption at the beginning of the study, and the participants returned for follow-up measurements seven or eight years later.</p>
<p>After adjusting for age, gender and ethnicity, the investigators found that regular soft drinks were not significantly associated with the development of obesity, but diet soft drinks were.</p>
<p>&#8220;Preliminary analysis of the data showed that for every can or bottle of diet soda that a normal weight person drank per day, there was a 65 percent increase in the risk of becoming overweight and a 41 percent increase in the risk of becoming obese for every can or bottle consumed,&#8221; Fowler noted.
</p></blockquote>
<p>If none of that suits, there&#8217;s always fruit.  A ripe bananas is very sweet, and it&#8217;s always in season at the grocery store.  If you really need a sugar hit, raisins, dates and dried figs all contain a lot of tasty, tasty sugar in the form mother nature intended.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://astrogirl.com/2009/11/16/zero-calorie-sweeteners/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Missing Out&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://astrogirl.com/2009/11/12/missing-out/</link>
		<comments>http://astrogirl.com/2009/11/12/missing-out/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 19:15:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nicole</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Food]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web log]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[agave nectar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[artificial sweeteners]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Diet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[locavore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[low Carbohydrate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paleo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[processed food]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unconventional Diets]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://astrogirl.com/2009/11/12/missing-out/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When following a diet for health, weight loss, social conscience, whatever, there seems to be this idea that you shouldn&#8217;t have to &#8220;miss out&#8221; on conventional foods or those foods that got you fat and/or sick in the first place. 


 While watching the third installment of  The 100 Mile Challenge , I was annoyed by how these folks who  volunteered  to only eat foods from within a 100 mile radius of their home were totally freaking out about not having wheat-based bread and pasta.  [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I keep coming across this idea in the course of my daily rummaging, and it keeps poking me to write about it.  When following a diet for health, weight loss, social conscience, whatever, there seems to be this idea that you shouldn&#8217;t have to &#8220;miss out&#8221; on conventional foods or those foods that got you fat and/or sick in the first place.</p>
<p>While watching the third installment of <a href="http://planetgreen.discovery.com/tv/mile-challenge.html" target="_blank">The 100 Mile Challenge</a>, I was annoyed by how these folks who *volunteered* to only eat foods from within a 100 mile radius of their home were totally freaking out about not having wheat-based bread and pasta.  This seemed especially wimpy to me for a variety of reasons, but the folks acting as guides and leaders, <a href="http://100milediet.org/book" target="_blank">James and Elisa</a>, thought that if they didn&#8217;t find some wheat, and soon, they would have too many drop-outs from the challenge.  I realize that a lot of the problem is that people can&#8217;t cook, but how hard is it to just *let go* of it?  The spices and the coffee would be a lot harder for me than bread, but then I&#8217;ve gone without bread before.  Still, it&#8217;s only 100 days.</p>
<p>Another glaring example of this is what has become of <a href="http://www.atkins.com/Products.aspx" target="_blank">Atkins Nutritionals</a>.  Atkins now seems to involve eating some Frankenfoods every day, right from the beginning.  The original diet (Induction, first phase) was about eating meat or eggs, real cheese and several servings of non-starchy green vegetables (and there are a lot of those as options!).  The diet now allows soy products and one to two servings of Atkins bars and shakes.  The ingredients list on the shakes and bars is really <a href="http://freetheanimal.com/2009/07/atkins-lost-souls.html" target="_blank">alarming</a>.  They now contain peanuts, soy and milk.  The low-carb baking mix (which I always found disgusting anyway) contains gluten.  If you do the <a href="http://www.lowcarbshow.com/home/index.php?Itemid=2&#038;id=29&#038;option=com_content&#038;task=view" target="_blank">1972 version of Atkins</a>, you get a far more natural diet, and you might even find out that one of the common allergen foods is a problem for you.  If you do it the way Atkins Nutritionals would have you do it, you&#8217;ll have no chance of that.  Does the diet even *work* any more?  Who knows.  </p>
<p>The largest problem with Atkins is that people don&#8217;t seem to learn anything from <a href="http://www.meatasaur.us/2009/11/thoughts-on-atkins.html" target="_blank">the diet</a>, go right back to eating all their favorite sugary foods and gain all the weight back.  If they had to do a real re-think on what they were eating, maybe they&#8217;d, you know, develop some good life-long eating habits?</p>
<p>Most gluten-free cookbooks seem to be about cakes and cookies and especially cupcakes.  The end product of gluten-free baking is even more calorific, sugary and fattening than the stuff made with wheat.  It&#8217;s *very* hard to bake without wheat, but the hoops you have to jump through to make a cake rise are simply not pretty.  Cupcakes are smaller and more error-free.  I can make a decent flat bread/wrap kind of thing and a good pie crust, but I don&#8217;t eat these all the time.  To make use of one of these cookbooks, I&#8217;d have to eat dessert every day!  The other thing that bugs me about gluten-free flours:  bean flours are actually quite hard to digest &#8211; they are not something you want to be eating if you can&#8217;t digest gluten.</p>
<p>And while were on the subject of sweets, what *is* it with Paleo and Low-Carb recipe sites?  The seem to be about 75% desserts.  A certain kind of <a href="http://www.thepaleodiet.com/">Paleo-Diet</a>-following-person seems to eat some kind of <a href="http://www.paleofood.com/baked.htm" target="_blank">almond or coconut based pancake</a> nearly every day for breakfast.  Many seem to eat a lot of cookies or other desserts involving agave nectar and almond flour.  I&#8217;ve never had agave nectar, but no matter what you want to say about where it falls on the Glycemic Index, it&#8217;s an intense source of sugar, much like honey.  This is not something Paleolithic people would have been eating even once a month.  There are so many hacks commonly used, but they really amount to eating processed foods that just barely fit into a rigid set of rules (grains, legumes, sugar,  dairy or potatoes, though adherance on the potato thing varies and some people don&#8217;t count sweet potatoes).  If you bake almonds into a cake or pancake, you are eating a huge amount of them &#8211; far more than you&#8217;d be likely to eat otherwise.</p>
<p>What are you really missing out on, and why are you missing it?  If you gave those things up, you had a reason.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://astrogirl.com/2009/11/12/missing-out/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
